Afripreneurs and Lionesses

“If the Asian Tiger was the economic success story of the last decades of the 20th century, the African Lion is going to be the success story of the twenty-first.” –Ashish J. Thakkar, Founder, Mara Group and Africa’s first billionaire 

“Women Hold Half the Sky.” –Mao Zedong

To explain the timing of our #africamp adventure: In December, Jamie left her long and celebrated tenure at Camp Tel Yehudah and I completed my MBA at Baruch College. It was with a new education, interest and curiosity towards private sector solutions that I arrived to Africa, and my expectations for seeing those solutions in action were met and easily exceeded.

Foreign aid conversations produce endless eye-rolls and shrugs. Our ethos dictates to give to the less fortunate; but the results of our foreign aid produce a mixed picture at best, and a failure at worst. But this is not just a foreign aid challenge, it is a general philanthropy problem. Improving “monitoring and evaluation” is an organizational hot topic in the non-profit world to compensate for the philanthropic sector’s lack of access to the best monitoring and evaluation tool: the market.

As Jacqueline Novogratz, states in The Blue Sweater, “Philanthropy alone lacks the feedback mechanisms of markets, which are the best listening devices we have.”

Businesses serve and rely on their customers. If a company cannot provide satisfactory services for a reasonable price, the customer finds it somewhere else and the company dies a natural death. However, many non-profits serve an audience but rely on a different group: funders. This bifurcation often creates “zombie” organizations that do not effectively serve their audience, but still limp along because funders artificially keep them alive, often because public fawning and praise for one’s generosity is as addictive as any drug.

This has proven to be an insurmountable challenge for much of the non-profit world.

Jamie Workshop

Jamie leads a skill-building workshop on communication at Akilah.

The Global South, and Africa in particular, understands the depth of this flaw. Around a trillion dollars of charity and foreign aid have arrived to the continent since the 1950’s and the impact of all that money is… not much. Foreign aid’s most notable, and regrettable, impact has been letting cruel and incompetent dictatorships off the hook by building the country’s infrastructure for them, allowing them to pilfer national reserves. I suggest John Kerry take a page from Josh Ruxin’s book, Thousand Hills to Heaven, “the most corrupt fifteen percent of nations – twenty-five countries, more or less, should be on the foreign aid black list, except…for dire emergencies.”

Just as important, the mindset of Westerners building Africa on behalf of Africans promotes a narrative that they are unable to do it themselves; a particularly dangerous form of racism masked by noble intentions.

My time here has taught me that Africans do not need, or want, Westerners to come build the continent for them. Rwanda’s government has made cultivating local business and attracting foreign investments a top priority. Officially registering a business is not only easy, but something that can be done in six hours. President Kagame has created a culture of accountability and service within the government, setting apart Rwanda from her neighbors. Philanthropies are noticing, and more enlightened ones have figured out not to lecture Rwandans, but listen first and then support.

We had several points of contact with the African Innovation Prize, which helps schools and organizations run business plan competitions, offering educational support for contestants and one-on-one mentorship for contest winners as they get their business started. Their model involves bringing in Western MBAs and business practitioners to mentor contestant winners three months. If Jamie and I don’t find work that we like in New York, you can expect us back here in that capacity.

What’s even more encouraging is that women are leading the way and the men increasingly not only realize it, but embrace it. Rwanda’s First Lady hosts a national “Miss Geek Competition,” challenging female Rwandan students to submit concepts to improve Rwanda’s standard of living through tech-based solutions. One of the students I advised at Agahozo Shalom Youth Village, Jermaine, submitted a concept to create a text message based national emergency response system. Another student, Ornella, wants to create an app that gives women access to information, both from professionals and crowd-sourced, on how to protect their reproductive health. One of my projects at Agahozo Shalom was advising on how to start a business plan competition for students, which we want to call “Start-up Rwanda” and will augment and showcase students’ creativity, problem-solving and initiative, the foundational elements of entrepreneurship.

Last week Jamie and I saw the enterprising skills of Rwandan women at the Nyamirambo Women’s Center, which runs a grassroots community tourism service with cooking classes, walking tours, and hand-made merchandise. They take “women’s work” and redefine it to make women financially independently.

Cooking Class

Learning how to cook at the Nyamirambo Women’s Center with Aminatha!

Jamie and I spent April consulting at the Akilah Institute for Women, which provides degrees to East African women in hospitality management, information technology management, and entrepreneurship. Jamie has developed a series of professional skill-building workshops; I worked with staff and alumnae to launch an alumnae association. The undertaking of Akilah is incredible, as are the women, who dedicate themselves to gaining the skills to provide for themselves, their family and communities. These young women come from across East Africa and epitomize how this generation is cutting against the historical grain, which dictated that men earn money while women stay home.

Andrew and Nida

Selfie with Nida, Inaugural President of the Akilah Alumnae Association.

None of these women is more impressive than Nida Giselle Iraguha, who graduated in 2015, got a job at Hotel Milles Collines (AKA The Hotel Rwanda) and was quickly offered a managerial position at the Kigali Convention Center (opening soon!). Nida is also the inaugural President of the Akilah Alumnae Association and has the kind of intelligence, charisma, and curiosity to galvanize her peers to move mountains. What is exciting is that soon Nida will be the expectation, not the exception, among Rwandan women.

Jamie and I are honored and inspired to witness and contribute in our own small way to Africa’s 21st century remedy to its 20th century ailments.

 

Lama Lo Uganda?

Jamie and I sojourned for a long weekend in Uganda. While Kampala didn’t impress us except for insane traffic, it was a wonderful break from work. We went whitewater rafting down the Nile River and lounged, ate, and happily languished in the sun with drinks in hand. As always, if you want to see photos, including of when we capsized (twice), check our Google Photo Album or follow me (@thewanderingview) or Jamie (@jewsforcheesus) on Instagram.

Not so long ago there was a popular Israeli song titled “Lama Lo Uganda?” Hebrew for, “Why not Uganda?” Here’s a little historical context: In the early 20th century, Great Britain was trying to figure out how to make allies of both Jews and Arabs leading up to World War I. The only way to do that was to find a solution to the conflicting Jewish and Arab aspirations for that blessed and cursed tract of land between the Jordan River and Mediterranean Sea. And Great Britain figured it out: let the Arabs have Palestine and give the Jews Uganda! It’s a national Jewish homeland, just in a place where Jews had no historical, spiritual, or physical connection; the Zionist Congress roundly rejected it. The song is lighthearted, ironically lamenting that maybe Uganda was the way to go.

The Uganda Plan was a bad idea; it shifted a problem instead of solving it and it attempted to hollow out the ideals of Zionism while leaving the packaging intact and call it whole. But cutting corners for convenience is ubiquitous: it’s in every organization, hierarchy, and culture in the form of jargon. I define jargon as when a term becomes a symbol and that symbol ends up replacing independent thinking and the goal it was actually established to meet. In business, managers constantly invoke the virtue of efficiency to drive decisions. But efficiency is never the business’s goal, just one indicator among many others. Eliyahu M. Goldratt and Jeff Cox capture this “tail wagging the dog” phenomenon in their book, “The Goal.”

url-1

In the non-profit industry, managers pray at the altar of innovation, but to what end? Innovation is important, but it so often causes so much hand-wringing it’s as if organizational missions are reduced to being the vehicle to simply showcase innovation. There are myriad examples to include but let’s move to the next point: Democracy in most of East Africa today is little more than jargon.

Democracy is when a society regulates itself to create constructive tension and harmony between individuals and sub-groups, to the benefit of that society as a whole. No one does this perfectly; democracy is as much a group journey as it as a set of systems and institutions.  America is an exciting democracy despite, and in some ways because of, its warts, many of which are on full display when Donald Trump tries to poison our country for his own profit. Borrowing from MLK, America’s moral arc is long and uneven, but it bends towards justice. Our democracy is more inclusive and mature than it was 50 years ago and 50 years from now it will be even more so than today.

But in most of East Africa, while the word democracy is everywhere, only the packaging is left intact. Elections were just held in Uganda; President Yoweri Museveni won handily and few believe the results have any authenticity. Elections are the easiest imitations of democracy to display for foreign governments and investors and, in this region, they rarely reflect popular opinion. Even in South Africa, where election results are honest, anyone who is not a beneficiary of the African National Congress hardly feels like they get a whisper in government decisions. Many protest, but more resign themselves to a corrupt, incompetent government. The regimes in Kenya and (un)Democratic Republic of the Congo are too busy remembering who they took bribes from to even feign democracy.

Is this a uniform condemnation? Hardly. We have a fairly fixed conception of democracy: regular elections with universal suffrage, an independent judiciary, protection of press, free expression, and private property. All of these may be a part of our utopian vision but if those conditions are the whole of the democracy we promote, instead of the core pursuit of creating harmony within a society, then we compel these countries to jargnoize democracy for the sake of foreign cash flow. In “Long Walk to Freedom” Nelson Mandela speaks about his childhood village tribal councils. Tribesmen would come to the hall of the chief, present pressing conflicts, and the chief would build an agreement by consensus. The chief was born into his position, so by our standards this is not a democracy. Yet Mandela praised this system as democratic since it settled conflict and created cooperation among quarreling neighbors. Who am I to disagree with the great Madiba!

In “We Wish to Inform You that Tomorrow We will be Killed with our Families” President Museveni explains his disinterest in a Ugandan multi-party democracy by making the comparison to a man with a heart condition who tries to prove his good health and kills himself in the process. The “democratizing” of Iraq and Arab Spring prove the point quite well. We jammed in the mechanisms of democracy where the societal cohesiveness was not strong enough to hold up and what we got are dictators and the Islamic State.

m_28

Zimbabwe’s President Robert Mugabe, Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni, DRC’s President Joseph Kabila, Uhuru Kenyatta of Kenya, and Jacob Zuma at a ceremony to celebrate the peaceful transfer of power in Tanzania.

Rwandan President Paul Kagame also leads a single-party government and controls the army, which does not hesitate to instruct people on how they should vote when elections are held; no one expects this to change, but should we wag our finger at Kagame? It was only 22 years ago that Rwanda suffered a genocide rooted in the rivalry between Hutus and Tutsis. For democracy to work, citizens must believe that their destiny is enmeshed with the destiny of all their neighbors. Otherwise the staples of democracy are little more than a coat of polish on tribal vitriol. Perhaps Rwanda will host a vibrant political discourse someday with great discord and dignity, but to push that prematurely is not just dangerous, it’s radioactive. You need look no further than Burundi on Rwanda’s southern border to see that Hutu-Tutsi violence remains a potent threat.

So what am I to think? Democracy is a fig leaf for single party rulers, so that’s bad!

But that may be the only way to set the foundations to uphold a democracy, so that’s good!

But we’ll only know that’s the case if a peaceful transfer of power can take place, so that’s…inconclusive.

There is no stress test for if these governments are ushering their countries towards democracy or away from it. Only when Kagame, Museveni, et al either die or step down will we know down which road they have led their people. How frustrating to the instant gratification seeking millennial who is thirsty to witness history, good or bad.

Maybe I should just be content with a fun get-away and ask “Lama Lo Uganda?”